Newbie choice of Cisco 1900 vs 2900

I have a small office network with 10/100mbps NICs in 15 computers as

well as a few network printers and netcams. The server is running

Windows 2003 and SQL 2000 and also has a 10/100mbs NIC. The database is

somewhat traffic intensive.

I have come into possesion of a Cisco Catylyst Cisco 1900     and a separate

2900. Would there be an advantage to using one of these switches over

the other in this situation?

In article <(E-Mail Removed) .com>,

rbob <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

:I have a small office network with 10/100mbps NICs in 15 computers as

:well as a few network printers and netcams. The server is running

:Windows 2003 and SQL 2000 and also has a 10/100mbs NIC. The database is

:somewhat traffic intensive.

;I have come into possesion of a Cisco Catylyst 1900 and a separate

;2900. Would there be an advantage to using one of these switches over

;the other in this situation?

1900: 10 Mbit ports except for 2 uplinks; runs CatOS

2900: 10/100 ports, some models have gigabit; some models run IOS;

some models have Layer 3 operations (i.e., routing); some models

have QoS and rate limiting

2900 covers a large range of capabilities -- too large a range to

use as a family designator. The 2901/2902 were very different than

the 2948G-L3, and quite different again from the 2950. The 2950 is

a current model; the 2901 went end-of-sale in 1999.

I guess my question is with a small network such as mine I could use

the 24 ports of the  Cisco 3925E    compared to the 12 ports of the 2901 but would

there be any speed difference (10mbps of 1900 vs 10/100mbps or 2901) ?